Industrial Age Tools vs Information Age Weapons

Industrial Age Tools vs Information Age Weapons


Vivek Sood




January 8, 2019

This is the part 2 of my earlier post What I Learnt Fighting Pirates (Not in the Caribbean)! (that post was getting too long, so I had to break it into two parts). I asked bosun to send a repelling party to cut the ladder and the scrambling rope, while I sent two other reconnaissance parties to the stern and starboard side of the ship to make sure there were no other boarding parties in the dark. Meanwhile, I was getting an emergency command post established on the boat deck. I sent the cadets to get walkie talkies and give these to the leaders of each of the party.

As  the pirates’ associate on the deck was pulling up the ladder, another of them was fast scrambling up the rope to help him secure the beachhead.

Our repelling party was still about 50 meters away when the second pirate was on board. He unleashed a big weapon (I will not name the weapon because my sons read my blogs and I do not want them to get wrong ideas) that stopped our repelling party in its track.

That gave the first pirate enough time to tie the rope ladder and up they came with their weapons and numbers. Obviously, we did not want any casualties. It appeared that even the pirates were eager to avoid casualties.   We reached a sort of short stalemate – they controlled the deck with superior weapons and numbers.

We had the advantage of height and visibility from boat deck, and we controlled the accommodation. Their worst case would have been to jump back over the ships side into the water, scramble into their boats and disappear into the night. Our worst case would have been to close all the accommodation water tight doors (thick steel doors) and lock up from inside. We were still trying to gauge their intentions. What were they after?

Did they want to hijack the ship? Did they want the cash from the captain’s safe? Did they want the crew’s valuables? Did they mistakenly believe that the ships’ cargo was something valuable which could be sold at big profit locally?

As the two rival parties stood on the deck eyeing each other – soon their intentions became clear. A few of them started approaching a bunch of 200 Liter drums tied up on the deck. These were delivered that very day, and contained lubricating oil for the ships engines. Hard to recall the exact number but there were around 20-30 drums totaling about 4000-6000 liters of lubricating oil. Why would they want it – we do not know. But one by one  – they untied each drum and lowered it into their boats till all of them were taken.

From our point of view, this was not something to lose life over. In fact, the only thing we were prepared to defend, was the accommodation – because it was necessary, and a feasible task.

With their superior weapons they were in a position to take any of the deck stores (or even cargo); these things were insured and replaceable.

They made no such attempts, and disembarked to leave soon after. It was not a huge loss of goods .

Still, this incident rankles in my memory as I try and think about what we could have done better.

We could surely have a number of watchmen instead of just one QM on duty. Extra watch would have ensured that no ropes with grappling hooks were left uncut.  But given that crews in most ships are stretched too thin – that would be done only in piracy prone areas, which this was not known to be.

Plus, our ship did not have valuable cargo that generally attracts pirates. We could have also run faster to prevent the ladder being lowered to them. But second pirate put an end to that quest. If our repelling party had reached them when the second pirate was still on the scrambling rope, we might have succeeded in cutting his rope and also cutting the ladder away. But they had chosen boarding spot carefully – nearly 150 meters away from the accommodation.

Takes a long time to get to in a situation like this, where split seconds make all the difference. We could have better weapons, so we could have a fairer fight at hand, and there are pros and cons to that argument in that situation. But, in another set of situations,

I see people grappling with impossible odds with inadequate weapons all the time. I am talking about business  transformations that I help companies with for the last 19 years since becoming a management consultant after my MBA.

Traditional tools of industrial age – methodologies, knowledge, practices and power structures are regularly deployed to fight superior forces of information age. Most people do not know the difference between the information age weapons and the industrial age tools, till it is too late.

Take a look at the graphic at the end of the blog.

And, if you are still convinced that you have everything for the fight ahead – head out to Diagnostic Tool Kit to confirm your opinion.

On the other hand, if you are still taking stock of the situation, like I was doing from the boat deck before sending the repelling party out, Diagnostic Tool Kit will immediately give you the necessary information to formulate your game plan.

Changing Role of Supply Chain Management in Digital Economy

Copyright - These concepts, frameworks and ideas are copyright of GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN GROUP from the time of their creation. Do NOT copy these without permission and proper attribution.


  1. These ideas and concepts will be usually expressed by our thought leaders in multiple forums - conferences, speeches, books, reports, workshops, webinars, videos and training. You may have heard us say the same thing before.
  2. The date shown above the article refers to the day when this article was updated. This blog post or article may have been written anytime prior to that date. 
  3. All anecdotes are based on true stories to highlight the key points of the article - some details are changed to protect identification of the parties involved. 
  4. You are encouraged to comment below - your real identity and email will not be revealed when your comment is displayed.  Insightful comments will be  featured, and will win a copy of one of our books. Please keep the comments relevant, decorous and respectful of everyone. All comments represent opinions of the commentators.

Vivek Sood

Our Quick Notes On Five Flows Of Supply Chain Management

Part of our new “Quick Notes” series – this report answers your most pertinent questions of the topic.

  • What are the five flows of SCM?
  • Why are they important TO YOU?
  • How can you map, track, and optimise these flows to serve YOU?
  • What is the importance of difference between "Supply Chain" and "Value Chain"?
  • What are the stellar case studies of each of the five flows?


USD 20


Experimental Models In Supply Chain Management
The Most Promising Application of AI in Supply Chains
How To Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Reduce Decision Making Time in COVID-19 Triggered SCM Crises?
  • Very fearful Story about your journey at that time. But I appreciate how you co-relate it to business or business thinker. I agree with the concept of “Industrial Age Tools Vs Information Age Weapons” Thanks

    • Piracy has grown many fold since that time. There are entire regions around Africa which are now semi-controlled by pirates. Anti-piracy measures (and insurance related to piracy) have become big business, as is the piracy itself.

  • By reading your blog I have studied for information age weapons but eventually, I am not aware of information age weapons anymore but on doing research what I have found I would like to share it with you please have a look at my research.

    In today’s information age, the coexistence of nuclear weapons with advanced conventional weapons and information-based concepts of warfare is a military contradiction.

    Nuclear deterrence was initially predicated on geopolitical, military, and technical assumptions. These were based on Cold War politics, rational deterrence theory, the concept of mutual vulnerability, and the fact that information and technology diffusion was limited. Today, however, far from being obsolete, nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction have not only survived, but have become weapons for states that face security threats, including perceived threats of nuclear blackmail, or expectation of conflicts. This study focuses on this unplanned coexistence of two distinct arts of war, including the possibility that states like the U.S. may be held hostage to nuclear blackmail by “outlier” regimes or terrorists, such as North Korea. It shows that restricting nuclear proliferation should still be on the agenda of policymakers, and calls for a revitalized global nonproliferation regime.
    Let me know if this information is useful or not or it is irrelevant from your point of view?

  • {"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}